Re: [bitfolk] Ubuntu EOL dates - which to quote in general …

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Ubuntu EOL dates - which to quote in general documentation?

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 30 21:24:09 2021 UTC
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>" [unknown]
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 09:16:20PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> In my experience very few people understand about "main" vs
> "universe" and "multiverse". I might be one of them.


Er, as in I might be one of the people that doesn't understand! My
reading of Ubuntu's Security Team FAQ has long led me to believe
that packages in the "universe" and "multiverse" section actually
have no official security support, only Ubuntu developers deciding
to push an update. But maybe I have that wrong.

Cheers,
Andy