Re: [bitfolk] Ubuntu EOL dates - which to quote in general …

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Ubuntu EOL dates - which to quote in general documentation?

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 30 21:16:20 2021 UTC
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>" [unknown]
Hi Philip,

On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 06:45:01PM +0000, Philip Storry wrote:
> So I guess I'll be upgrading my VPS to 22.04 sometime next year, so that I
> don't get hit by the end of standard support. I don't want to find myself
> missing updates for things I know I'm using...


I don't think you have "standard security support" on anything in
"universe", only in "main" - ever. As far as I understand Ubuntu
security updates for packages in "universe" are best effort by the
community, not by the Ubuntu Security Team.

    https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/FAQ


or have I misunderstood?

> I doubt many servers are using ONLY main, unless they're very
> simple.


In my experience very few people understand about "main" vs
"universe" and "multiverse". I might be one of them.

Once again I will say that CentOS's straightforward 10 year support
promise was one of the reasons why people liked it. But
understandably that was a lot of work for Red Hat.

Cheers,
Andy

--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting