Re: [bitfolk] We will be charging for additional IPv4 addres…

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M+---+\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MM++\MMNigel Barker at <-
.MMMMMAndy Loughran at ->

Reply to this message
Author: Michael Stevens
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] We will be charging for additional IPv4 addresses on a recurringbasis from Monday 14th March 2016
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:22:14AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> If there is something I have forgotten to cover, please do let us
> know, either by replying here to to support@???.

I've been using multiple IPs for SSL. Does anyone who pays more
attention to these things know if SNI
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication) is a workable
alternative these days?

Michael

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [bitfolk] We will be charging for additional IPv4 addresses on a recurringbasis from Monday 14th March 2016Re: [bitfolk] We will be charging for additional IPv4 addresses on a recurring basis from Monday 14th March 2016->
Bitfolk Mailing List Archive administrated by List AdminLurker (version 2.3)