Hi Robert,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07:38AM +0100, Robert Gauld wrote:
> I'm sending this to the list rather than as a support request in the hope
> that other people have noticed this and can add a me too which may help Andy
> track down the issue. I first noticed this yesterday and confirmed that it
> is still the same today, when I go to the backups page in the panel
> apparently my backups are taking no space, however if I mount the backups on
> my VPS all appears well.
There was a bug found in the disk quota script last night. When the
backups were recently distributed out to three hosts instead of one
it appears that the script running on hosts that your backups
*aren't* on were left still able to reporting your usage - as zero.
The backups are still there and I expect this is a simple bug which I
will fix today.
Those of you who are experiencing difficulty in mounting your
backups should contact support as that is likely to be a different
issue.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
From jan@??? Fri Sep 30 11:31:50 2011
Received: from balder.henkins.za.net ([212.13.195.94])
by bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <jan@???>) id 1R9bJm-0007Vt-St
for users@???; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:31:50 +0000
Received: from balder.henkins.za.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by balder.henkins.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858AD8823E
for <users@???>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:22:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 212.13.194.114
(SquirrelMail authenticated user jan@???)
by balder.henkins.za.net with HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:22:54 +0100
Message-ID: <488da2a0c5ae8dd0c020902c028e2b26.squirrel@???>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:22:54 +0100
From: "Jan Henkins" <jan@???>
To: "Bitfolk Users" <users@???>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Fri,
30 Sep 2011 11:31:50 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 212.13.195.94
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jan@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Subject: [bitfolk] Nginx with php-fpm
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jan@???
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:31:51 -0000
Hello All,
Does anybody here use Nginx with php-fpm, or have strong opinions for or
against this combo? I'm looking to move towards this for performance
reasons, and also to have the advantages of FastCGI's way of handling use=
r
permissions. Using Apache in this way is of course not off the cards, but
I also look at this as an opportunity to broaden my knowledge a bit -
after using Apache exclusively for more than 12 years, it's probably time
to play with some new toys! :-)
Any and all comments welcome.
--=20
Regards,
Jan Henkins
From ian@??? Fri Sep 30 13:36:55 2011
Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48])
by bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <ian@???
