[bitfolk] Re VPS Security

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Keith Williams
Date:  
Subject: [bitfolk] Re VPS Security
balder.henkins.za.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:22:54 +0100
From: "Jan Henkins" <jan@???>
To: "Bitfolk Users" <users@???>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Fri,
    30 Sep 2011 11:31:50 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 212.13.195.94
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jan@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
    shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
    * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Subject: [bitfolk] Nginx with php-fpm
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jan@???
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:31:51 -0000


Hello All,

Does anybody here use Nginx with php-fpm, or have strong opinions for or
against this combo? I'm looking to move towards this for performance
reasons, and also to have the advantages of FastCGI's way of handling use=
r
permissions. Using Apache in this way is of course not off the cards, but
I also look at this as an opportunity to broaden my knowledge a bit -
after using Apache exclusively for more than 12 years, it's probably time
to play with some new toys! :-)

Any and all comments welcome.

--=20
Regards,
Jan Henkins



From ian@??? Fri Sep 30 13:36:55 2011
Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48])
    by bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <ian@???>) id 1R9dGn-0003Ym-RC
    for users@???; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:36:54 +0000
Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35])
    by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com
    (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id
    <20110930133646.DZUM17426.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@???>
    for <users@???>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:36:46 +0100
Received: from [192.168.0.12] (really [86.12.69.109])
    by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com
    (InterMail vG.3.00.04.00 201-2196-133-20080908) with ESMTP id
    <20110930133646.OQLT24017.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@???>
    for <users@???>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:36:46 +0100
Message-ID: <4E85C5E2.2050405@???>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:36:34 +0100
From: Ian Hobson <ian@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
    rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <488da2a0c5ae8dd0c020902c028e2b26.squirrel@???>
In-Reply-To: <488da2a0c5ae8dd0c020902c028e2b26.squirrel@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=JvdXmxIgLJv2/GthKqHpGJEEHukvLcvELVXUanXFreg=
    c=1 sm=0 a=C8nw62IZT_EA:10 a=fb-7jwpbFnUA:10 a=dHlkjLs68AQA:10
    a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wSqK5E1qy3p-4AcwaJ8A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
    a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Fri,
    30 Sep 2011 13:36:53 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.103.221.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ian@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS5089 81.100.0.0/14
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
    shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
    no *      trust *      [81.103.221.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Nginx with php-fpm
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:36:55 -0000


On 30/09/2011 12:22, Jan Henkins wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Does anybody here use Nginx with php-fpm, or have strong opinions for or
> against this combo