Re: [bitfolk] The perils of opening tcp/22 to the Internet

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Alastair Sherringham
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] The perils of opening tcp/22 to the Internet
-epso1-0-0-cust306.6-3.cable.virginmedia.com [86.0.209.51])
    by vs1.vconsult.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41058E0A2
    for <users@???>; Tue,  9 Aug 2011 22:23:40 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4E41B36B.7090002@???>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 23:23:39 +0100
From: Martin Halford <martin@???>
Organization: Personal
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
    rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <20110601222858.GC4363@???>    <cd0afa03743d0a48622e725fefcbec13.squirrel@???>    <20110601224603.GD4363@???>
    <4E3EED07.40408@???>    <20110807195916.GD5935@???>
    <4E3EF223.9070901@???>    <20110807202209.GL5968@???>
    <4E3EF573.2050101@???>    <20110807203357.GE5935@???>
    <4E40414E.90704@???> <20110808201035.GK5935@???>
In-Reply-To: <20110808201035.GK5935@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Tue,
    09 Aug 2011 22:24:09 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 212.13.195.236
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
    shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
    * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Lenny-to-Squeeze Upgrade Plan - 2nd opinions sought!
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: martin@???
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:24:10 -0000


On 08/08/11 21:10, Andy Smith wrote:
> Ah OK. Yeah I'd say LABEL is equally good, Whatever you prefer. The
> point is to not have hard coded device paths.


I completed my upgrade from lenny to squeeze last night using a
combination of the wiki page, the archives of this list and the Debian
documentation.

The only problem I had of any significance was with Dovecot, which was
not delivering mail to virtual users after the upgrade. The problem was
to do with a change to the cmusieve plugin in Dovecot .

[Taken from a recent forum post] The protocol "managesieve" is now
called "lda" and the plugin "cmusieve" is called "sieve" from V1.2 of
Dovecot.

So you have to replace this in dovecot.conf :

protocol managesieve {

By :

protocol lda {

And:

mail_plugins = cmusieve quota

(be careful : it's the mail_plugins directive INSIDE THE "protocol lda {" )

By:

mail_plugins = sieve quota

After restarting