Re: [bitfolk] The perils of opening tcp/22 to the Internet

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: john lewis
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] The perils of opening tcp/22 to the Internet
D
X-Parrot: It is no more. It has joined the choir invisible.
X-IRC-Nicks: darksatanic darkersatanic darkling darkthing
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-frost.carfax.org.uk-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
    2001:ba8:1f1:f1d9:216:3eff:fe14:aef9 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Sun,
    04 Sep 2011 19:24:07 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f1d9:216:3eff:fe14:aef9
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hrm@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: 
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Cc: BitFolk Users List <users@???>
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Custom Spamassassin config
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:24:08 -0000



--byLs0wutDcxFdwtm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 07:52:17PM +0100, David Leadbeater wrote:
> On 4 Sep 2011, at 19:30, Hugo Mills wrote:
> [=E2=80=A6]
> > Is there any way I can get the X-frost.carfax.org.uk-Spam-Report:
> > header either suppressed completely, or (in preference) without the
> > content of the original message in it?
>=20
> The header is actually added on the MTA side rather than in spamd so
> it is configurable. An easier approach might be to avoid spam
> scanning mail you send outbound though.


Aaah, thanks. I grepped for the header in /etc/exim4/conf.d/ but I
didn't do it in /etc/exim4 -- now I see where the relevant bits are
kept.

Anything which requires me to do more than trivial changes to my
mail config is not "easier". :)

Hugo.

--=20
=3D=3D=3D Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk=
 =3D=3D=3D
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
     --- I don't care about "it works on my machine". We are not ---    =20
                         shipping your machine.                         =20


--byLs0wutDcxFdwtm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFOY9BTIKyzvlFcI40RApxHAJ9jsZpbAJCsIuVxYbbysR3UgeGw/ACfd0jg
DfOI5JC2Zxef+OXNztlQD3c=
=6DGK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--byLs0wutDcxFdwtm--


From bitfolk-users@??? Sun Sep 04 20:58:53 2011
Received: from xvm-23-214.ghst.net ([92.243.23.214]
    helo=dogfood3.lampservers.net) by bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <bitfolk-users@???>) id 1R0JmA-0004me-OM
    for users@???; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 20:58:53 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
    by dogfood3.lampservers.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E30126BC6
    for <users@???>; Sun,  4 Sep 2011 20:58:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dogfood3.lampservers.net ([127.0.0.1])
    by localhost (dogfood3.lampservers.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
    port 10024) with ESMTP id wlGyadALMqU7 for <users@???>;
    Sun,  4 Sep 2011 20:58:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (193.Red-83-46-44.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net
    [83.46.44.193]) (Authenticated sender: dom@???)
    by dogfood3.lampservers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77FAC26BBA
    for <users@???>; Sun,  4 Sep 2011 20:58:38 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4E63E67B.9010806@???>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:58:35 +0200
From: Dom Latter <bitfolk-users@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
    rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Sun,
    04 Sep 2011 20:58:46 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 92.243.23.214
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bitfolk-users@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: 
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Subject: [bitfolk] Bandwidth
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: U