Another hobby user here. While it would be a little inconvenient to be cut
off it would be greatly preferable to an enormous bill. I think a
user-configurable limit would be the way forward, if only because you're
likely to get a lot of variation in what people consider an acceptable
point to cut off service. Us personal users will have a different pain
threshold than someone who's got commercial interests, for example.
Regards,
Andy
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 11:31 Ole-Morten Duesund <olemd@???> wrote:
> On 21. juni 2018 07:17, Sämi Bächler wrote:
> > Hi Andy
> >
> >> Am 20.06.2018 um 09:14 schrieb john lewis <zen57162@???>:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:33:42 +0100
> >> Steven Walker <sjb.walker@???> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Speaking as a hobby user who never gets even close to the limit I
> >>> would not want to occur substantial charges and have no problem with
> >>> having my service suspended. I would not quibble with having an
> >>> extra charge of a month or two. After all it can only be the
> >>> customer's fault for not monitoring the usage or reading emails.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I am in a similar position and would not have a problem having my
> >> service suspended
> >
> > +1
>
> +1 - my only problem is that I'm hosting my mail at my VM, so getting
> suspended would be a major inconvenience to say the least.
>
> I should probably make sure I've registered a secondary contact-method.
>
> But as others say, an extra month or two would be fine; a 300 times
> increase however would be a problem.
>
> - OM
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
