Re: [bitfolk] c.authns.bitfolk.com borken?

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] c.authns.bitfolk.com borken?

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Mon May 9 16:54:20 2022 UTC
gpg: using DSA key 0E4236CB52951E14536066222099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>" [unknown]
Hi Mike, Andy,

On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 06:07:25AM +0100, Mike Zanker via users wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2022, at 12:33 AM, Andy Bennett wrote:
> > Until this evening my ACL was:
> >
> > -----
> > 85.119.80.222; 2001:ba8:1f1:f019::53; // a.authns.bitfolk.com


[…]

> Exactly what I had, too!


Ah, OK. The v6 address did change, yes. It was at a time when no
zone transfers took place over v6 (it was changed specifically to
allow this) so I don't think I bothered to notify people of that
change.

In future for both v4 and v6 addresses we would go to great efforts
to let people know about any changes in the addresses of
a.authns.bitfolk.com but the best we can do is mention it on the
announce@ list plus contact anyone whose AXFRs began to fail.

> >> Maybe we should add some serial number monitoring, so if your zone
> >> serial number changes but ours doesn't (because AXFR failed) then
> >> that difference would be an alert.
>
> I do like the sound of that, Andy (Smith).


Have added that as this feature request:

    https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/209


If there's any thoughts or comments on how you would like that to
work, they are best added there.

Cheers,
Andy

--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting