Re: [bitfolk] Volunteers sought for running 32-bit guests un…

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Volunteers sought for running 32-bit guests under pvshim

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Wed Dec 8 13:25:04 2021 UTC
gpg: using DSA key 0E4236CB52951E14536066222099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>" [unknown]
Hello,

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 05:12:23AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> So, if you're currently running a 32-bit PV mode VM please would you
> consider volunteering to let us test booting it under pvshim? If so,
> please reply to me off-list letting me know what sort of time of day
> would be acceptable to try it out.


I should have made clearer that ideally we are looking for
volunteers with older kernels that they can't / don't intend to
upgrade them.

If you have a kernel version of 4.19 or above you are better off
switching to PVH mode directly; this is something you can do
yourself from the Xen Shell with the "virtmode" command.

    https://tools.bitfolk.com/wiki/PVH#Switching_Between_PV_And_PVH_Mode


From our point of view:

Best:           64-bit PVH


Okay:           64-bit PV


Not ideal:      32-bit PVH


Also not ideal: 32-bit in pvshim

Needs action: 32-bit PV

Cheers,
Andy

--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting