Re: [bitfolk] Bitfolk apt-cacher "403 Forbidden file type or…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Paul Tansom
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Bitfolk apt-cacher "403 Forbidden file type or location"
** john lewis <zen57162@???> [2019-02-20 15:38]:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:25:44 +0000
> Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
>
> > In the mean time if it is causing you a problem with your
> > do-release-upgrade my best suggestion is to remove the first
> > "apt-cacher.lon.bitfolk.com/ubuntu/" out of every URL in your
> > /etc/apt/sources.list, "sudo apt update" and try again.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andy
>
> Better still use Debian (like most of Hants LUG did till that upstart
> U????? came along)

** end quote [john lewis]

Well I was using Debian until their policy caused me too much hassle
getting Linux installed on some hardware. It was easier to try Ubuntu
(given I had a handy CD) than try to rebuild the install CD with the
necessary drivers. Then a combination brand recognition for non Linux
customers and the regular release cycle / LTS resulted in gradually
standardising. That's about 13 years ago now - wow!

Of course, given the similarity of the infrastructure software used this
could be an issue for the Debain repositories too :-)

Hi John, btw. I was chatting Hants LUG at the PLUG meet last weekend
with someone who came along to some or the early meets. Took me back a
bit!

--
Paul Tansom | Aptanet Ltd. | https://www.aptanet.com/ | 023 9238 0001
Vice Chair, FSB Portsmouth & SE Hampshire Branch | http://www.fsb.org.uk/
=============================================================================
Registered in England | Company No: 4905028 | Registered Office: Ralls House,
Parklands Business Park, Forrest Road, Denmead, Waterlooville, Hants, PO7 6XP