gpg: Signature made Fri Nov 23 19:12:54 2018 UTC
gpg: using RSA key AA62533B3CA64488DF7692A7E2E589EDD062903B
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On 23 Nov 2018, at 18:11, Ed <ed-bitfolk@???> wrote:
> The syntax is appealing. It mimics 'pf' which I found very easy to read.
> nftables seemed to a bit behind iptables, I could be wrong, if they're
> at the same capability level now then I think maintaining iptables would
> be less desirable. Might have been dreaming, did RH say they were were
> going to use nftables for the next release?
It’s already in at least RHEL 7.6 (and, therefore, CentOS 7.6). It’s used underneath firewalld, but can be used by itself, too.
Cheers,
Mike
