Re: [bitfolk] routing problems, or is it me?

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: users
New-Topics: [bitfolk] Loss of connectivity to 80.0.0.0/8, Friday 29 Apr 2016 (Was Re: routing problems, or is it me?)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] routing problems, or is it me?

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Fri Apr 29 10:58:07 2016 UTC
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>" [unknown]
Hi Richard,

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:49:18AM +0100, Richard Passman wrote:
> Andy, We are seeing issues to the range 80.238.0.0/16 from both bitfolk and from our own systems colo’d with Jump.


Thanks. You are also seeing the problems with Jump because this is a
problem within Jump, which we use for transit.

So the list of affected prefixes so far is:

80.1.0.0/16
80.7.0.0/16
80.40.0.0/13
80.68.80.0/20
80.95.96.0/19
80.192.0.0/14
80.229.0.0/16
80.238.0.0/21
212.110.160.0/19

Cheers,
Andy

--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting