ter.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <1329567256.98879.YahooMailClassic@???> <20120218124404.GX23380@???>
<4F44DC1E.1050707@???>
<CAFTQQEkbvVbSNJ3QKSCQ_pTMyuu+m=CxWgd64n8kFsM7mnyNtg@???>
In-Reply-To: <CAFTQQEkbvVbSNJ3QKSCQ_pTMyuu+m=CxWgd64n8kFsM7mnyNtg@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
23 Feb 2012 18:08:18 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.97
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bitfolk-users@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] idle curiosity? bank phishing scam,
was Fw: Notice ID:01ZMCX
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:08:19 -0000
[sent to list, this time...]
On 22/02/12 14:10, Ian wrote:
> Dom Latter said:
>
>> - don't install Wordpress unless you can stay on top of updates 24/7.
>
> A bit cruel given how many websites use WordPress: it's not surprising
> that some get hacked. It's been a while since there's been a remote
Funnily enough just today I got a phishing mail with the target form
hosted in wp-content/uploads (or similar).
> There are quite a few plugins with published issues though, so we
> could add 'be careful about which plugins you install'.
And how does one do that?
From what I've seen, even the well-known and widely-used plugins can
be very badly coded. Security-auditing them would be a nightmare.
From bitfolk-users@??? Thu Feb 23 18:08:34 2012
Received: from dogfood4.lampservers.net ([85.119.83.97])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <bitfolk-users@???>) id 1S0d5l-0003KQ-Ka
for users@???; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:08:33 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dogfood4.lampservers.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C1729A20
for <users@???>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:08:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dogfood4.lampservers.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (dogfood4.lampservers.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024) with ESMTP id shaV5HxUBDuL for <users@???>;
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:08:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (cpc1-cmbg5-0-0-cust882.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com
[81.98.255.115]) (Authenticated sender: dom@???)
by dogfood4.lampservers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AAC229A0E
for <users@???>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:08:33 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F4680A1.4070604@???>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:08:33 +0000
From: Dom Latter <bitfolk-users@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <1329567256.98879.YahooMailClassic@???> <20120218124404.GX23380@???>
<4F44DC1E.1050707@???> <CAFTQQEkbvVbSNJ3QKSCQ_pTMyuu+m=CxWgd64n8kFsM7mnyNtg@???>
<F88F703C-9E17-4F98-B349-B51461808C12@???>
In-Reply-To: <F88F703C-9E17-4F98-B349-B51461808C12@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
23 Feb 2012 18:08:33 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.97
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bitfolk-users@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to fals
