Re: [bitfolk] Lenny-to-Squeeze Upgrade Plan - 2nd opinions s…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Martin Halford
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Lenny-to-Squeeze Upgrade Plan - 2nd opinions sought!
om/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 05:05:22 -0000


Sorry for jumping on this Tor thread a bit late, but I travelled to
Iran last summer [1] and met with some geeks. They used VPN software
to get around the censorship and not Tor.

Canadian VPN providers were popular IIRC.

What am I missing?


[1] http://geekout.org.uk/


From andy@??? Sat Feb 18 06:49:32 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1Rye6t-0004gg-UD
    for users@???; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:49:32 +0000
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:49:31 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120218064931.GT23380@???>
References: <CALdaYd06o3HAm_p+C7Qn87FJJbBftEiEm1FMBs_dDf4PkNF5yA@???>
    <20120217084250.GK32046@???>
    <CAF8XF0evbC-wn+H0yO13GPPwzRrOBYHvEpoTUw5PCZwad4z=TQ@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF8XF0evbC-wn+H0yO13GPPwzRrOBYHvEpoTUw5PCZwad4z=TQ@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
    18 Feb 2012 06:49:31 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    admin.kwak.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Tor Obsfucation
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:49:32 -0000


Hi Kai,

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 01:05:12PM +0800, Kai Hendry wrote:
> Sorry for jumping on this Tor thread a bit late, but I travelled to
> Iran last summer [1] and met with some geeks. They used VPN software
> to get around the censorship and not Tor.
>
> Canadian VPN providers were popular IIRC.
>
> What am I missing?


I guess that it's a combination of:

- Tor is quite simple and very well documented, it's also free,
anyone can use it, has broad support in operating systems and
browsers. It's probably easier for the non-technical person to
understand and evaluate than knowing how to use a VPN provider and
then find and pay for one.

As you say the people you met with were geeks, so I'm not
surprised they preferred something other than Tor. A working VPN
would definitely be a lot more pleasant to use than Tor.

- There's probably a worry that Iran may block the well-known VPN
protocols and ports, and even well-known providers, but they can't
really block all of Tor without blocking all of the Internet.

Cheers,
Andy

--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting


From kai.hendry@??? Sat Feb 18 08:04:45 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <kai.hendry@???>)
    id 1R