Re: [bitfolk] Digital Economy Act

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: Andy Bennett
CC: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Digital Economy Act
Hello,

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 02:42, Andy Bennett <andyjpb@???> wrote:
>> For SMTP specifically, the current specification is also quite clear
>> (RFC 5321, section 5.1):
>>
>>      "The lookup first attempts to locate an MX record associated with
>> the name. If a CNAME record is found, the resulting name is processed
>> as if it were the initial name. If a non-existent domain error is
>> returned, this situation MUST be reported as an error. If a temporary
>> error is returned, the message MUST be queued and retried later (see
>> Section 4.5.4.1)."
>
> Quite... and lack of any NS servers tends to be treated as a
> non-existent domain.


No, the lack of response from all authoritative nameservers for a
domain is not treated the same way as a "NXDOMAIN" response from one
of them. The former results in the resolver returning a temporary
error.

Regards,
Daniel


From andy@??? Fri Feb 17 08:42:51 2012
Received: from