ted with
the name. If a CNAME record is found, the resulting name is processed
as if it were the initial name. If a non-existent domain error is
returned, this situation MUST be reported as an error. If a temporary
error is returned, the message MUST be queued and retried later (see
Section 4.5.4.1)."
Earlier specifications were less clear, but this has always been the
common behaviour.
Regards,
Daniel
From andyjpb@??? Sun Feb 12 01:42:15 2012
Received: from pavilion.ashurst.eu.org ([85.119.82.45])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <andyjpb@???>)
id 1RwOSF-0006MG-92
for users@???; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:42:15 +0000
Received: from [31.185.58.229] (helo=[192.168.1.82])
by pavilion.ashurst.eu.org with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andyjpb@???>)
id 1RwOS8-0000tL-Rt; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:42:08 +0000
Message-ID: <4F371917.7040805@???>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:42:47 +0000
From: Andy Bennett <andyjpb@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_N=E9ri?= <daniel.neri+bitfolk@???>
References: <4F352183.4070708@???> <2AEAD09C-4403-484D-95BB-D0B313FC5DCD@???> <4F354B64.7040405@???>
<4F35596E.3000906@???> <4F364EB3.3000604@???> <85f2071f1be555fe6f6a47eb6bafbb58.squirrel@???> <4F36BCE3.7080905@???> <20120211191946.GG23380@???> <4F36F62A.2060001@???> <CAOpGBFQGpg-Gy4ebtwtvW=orY_B2r5CHgGZwXe=5Cr+yqb45gg@???> <f8f0546071ef17ef800b142fac067e7d.squirrel@???>
<CAOpGBFQqFx2dinCe3VtwzciYjNKeiuJCWmkMSpQ=T+rAY_=Kkw@???>
In-Reply-To: <CAOpGBFQqFx2dinCe3VtwzciYjNKeiuJCWmkMSpQ=T+rAY_=Kkw@???>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
12 Feb 2012 01:42:15 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.82.45
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andyjpb@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP address at Nominet's nameservers is wrong
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:42:15 -0000
Hi,
> For SMTP specifically, the current specification is also quite clear
> (RFC 5321, section 5.1):
>
> "The lookup first attempts to locate an MX record associated with
> the name. If a CNAME record is fou
