On 6 October 2011 01:11, Daniel Case <danielcase10@???> wrote:
> Aye, but I have about 5 players on here who haven't yet upgraded...
> will it kick up an error if they try to connect with 1.8.1?
>
Yup. You can wait for 1.9 of course. Just thought I'd mention it. 1.9
has some fun stuff :)
Al.
From andy@??? Thu Oct 06 02:18:22 2011
Received: from andy by bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RBdXS-0003j8-6C
for users@???; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 02:18:22 +0000
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 02:18:22 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20111006021821.GP4221@???>
References: <CALdaYd3nX9DJ-P2V=3e-QcHzsy0V=nhFsd6pCA4i2WichA+95Q@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALdaYd3nX9DJ-P2V=3e-QcHzsy0V=nhFsd6pCA4i2WichA+95Q@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Thu,
06 Oct 2011 02:18:22 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Bitfolk Minecraft Server
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 02:18:23 -0000
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:08:35PM +0100, Daniel Case wrote:
> As part of a test to see if Bitfolk can run an MC server, I now have a
> Bitfolk Minecraft VPS. Feel free to login and let me know about any
> issues you have, spread it around to friends and family as well and we
> will see how many people we can fit without terrible lag getting us
> all :)
I just want to point out at this stage that Daniel is investigating
what can be done with a given amount of resources, so I do expect
him to hit performance problems and for it to end up being unusable.
If you could let him know directly when this happens that would be
useful.
It's so that we can give a more meaningful answer next time someone
asks if you can run a Minecraft server on a BitFolk VPS.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
From mike@??? Thu Oct 06 10:24:18 2011
Received: from exprod6og113.obsmtp.com ([64.18.1.31])
by bitfolk.com with smtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <mike@???>) id 1RBl7e-00013h-DJ
for users@???; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:24:18 +0000
Received: from mail-iy0-f178.google.com ([209.85.210.178]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod6ob113.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP;
Thu, 06 Oct 2011 03:24:14 PDT
Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so3377089iab.9
for <users@???>; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 03:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zanker.org; s=google;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=Kyk9RjnAH/lE6lnx8yqR1HVGEHvkA/c8lFPAp6ikaHY=;
b=MKR6bvfWChc+CfATWKDu8J4KlPs3BxeHUh1DaXr1eA0O7kepXvpWMmoR87051NQlHb
AdeXFAm7EbJQk/3RDEGoGfJRGvFHrgC71Pun2iUJiuTSu/Ih5Ho51IwoXkYGZbCcMPyK
tailikH/r7ehYMFG+EW+pPgIfx2EZvSXrqBTQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.0.221 with SMTP id 29mr965956ibc.56.1317896648830; Thu, 06
Oct 2011 03:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.37.133 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 03:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:24:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOGWvnHsHdTMr2EX3dyf8jF4V8vuRziXYMVjOiDrM7Le7
