uest@????subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:06:26 -0000
Hello Ian and Progga,
Thanks for the great testimonials! :-)
On 30/09/11 14:36, Ian Hobson wrote:
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> I use it, and it works very well. Less memory and less CPU than Apache.
>
> Go for it.
>
> Regards
>
> Ian
>
--
Regards,
Jan Henkins
From announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@??? Sun Oct 02 10:36:23 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bitfolk.com)
by bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from
<announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???>)
id 1RAJPD-0000Pk-7N
for users@???; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:36:23 +0000
Received: from andy by bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RAJOy-0000OW-Nq
for announce@???; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:36:10 +0000
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:36:08 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: announce@???
Message-ID: <20111002103608.GR4221@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Sun,
02 Oct 2011 10:36:08 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
admin.kwak.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-BeenThere: announce@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1506665395=="
Sender: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
Errors-To: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Sun,
02 Oct 2011 10:36:23 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: [bitfolk] entropy.lon.bitfolk.com renumbered;
old IP address will stop responding on Sunday 30th October 2011
X-BeenThere: users@???
Reply-To: users@???
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:36:23 -0000
--===============1506665395==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CD/aTaZybdUisKIc"
Content-Disposition: inline
--CD/aTaZybdUisKIc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
entropy.lon.bitfolk.com [212.13.194.102] has been renumbered to
85.119.80.215. If you're making use of our free entropy service[1] then
you may be referring to this host by IP address in your
configuration[2].
Use of the entropy service is not configured by default, so if you
don't know what I'm talking about then you most likely don't have
anything to change.
The old IP address will continue to respond until Sunday 30th
October 2011, at which point we will be taking it out of service.
If you're currently referring to it by IP address then you should
change to the host name now.
A summary of all renumberings currently in progress can be found
here:
https://tools.bitfolk.com/wiki/Renumbering_out_of_212.13.194.0/23
If you have any questions, please reply to the list or to
support@???.
Cheers,
Andy
[1]
https://tools.bitfolk.com/wiki/Entropy
[2] Usually /etc/default/ekeyd-egd-linux on Debian/Ubuntu
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
"I
