4F7g7wsnKPPgUOJIRiX6xE/4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca;
h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=ME+rGnCKrBVCOcyaOXez4KHIouzSecevc9C54XZZyhn0eb8Lt8fmiNcrAXdxnqn82QCdDj4m8cbGvXlNc0l3PPZT3j80e2RBd4TQYmXVgJ7kcX7hl3LexedgUtoNVhV7vh7I6MQ0JexkrrI2nbAarnMGBm2fEUBgPQ8mnz8feUw=;
X-YMail-OSG: .vFYwN8VM1murWLPOEx8NuKbWPX02vDXpT5YvBTrQswbPjM
jIVJ9OlfxDvVukflIj_Z9P8DK1zFG5XalStv.IqmlfqekE5mtG6WzL5Yn454
bA9ZOnbLg89cZF4UDeRbV5RLDaYba.h5HFcwvl327XTzP2Wsakkn6_IbN2A0
0rl9QXLu89WYwtxMqjAxKI0u88GVuAEqGdk7SWcr6gAA.ELk3diby9ReC5jM
U70AeYCIERrtlsJlbHiGy1qQSu0Foo7BhhrwaabGE8eOvevguDoAocLZnLBy
65LzjZewV2kEQyHInEm9tA0l2wUtxlGbVbLT1Vt1UOw_Meime8Q19ZI6vD0B
UyHyn9rv_xYI95okCAAOZbzDm9u3DojPI0tzHTKR10mRgAJZla0brMBDLaJR
lpjZLyLENmN0-
Received: from [193.54.50.250] by web45309.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:38:01 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.113.315625
Message-ID: <1316543881.30969.YahooMailClassic@???>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Max B <txtmax@???>
To: users@???
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="1019582453-950655798-1316543881=:30969"
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Tue,
20 Sep 2011 18:51:55 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 98.139.91.95
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: txtmax@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS36752 98.139.64.0/19
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no * trust * [98.139.91.95 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Subject: [bitfolk] Fw: BitFolk VPS renewal reminder (25 Sep 2011 - 25 Sep
2012) (fwd)
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:51:56 -0000
--1019582453-950655798-1316543881=:30969
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Andy,
thanks for the renewal reminder (excerpted below).
The bitfolk change from 360-day 'years' to bonafide 365-day years a little =
while back was nice too.=20
Any hope you can give us customers more renewal notice than 7 days?=A0 It i=
s not always easy to juggle bills and bank accounts at the end of the month=
.=A0 I realise that my calendar should have warned me quite apart from your=
renewal notice, but It would be a nice touch if you could allow for an aut=
omated email 28, 21 14 and 7 days prior to deadline.
Cheers,
Max
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:57:08 +0000
From: BitFolk Billing <billing@???>
Subject: BitFolk VPS renewal reminder (25 Sep 2011 - 25 Sep 2012)
Dear customer,
Your VPS host 'urquell.bitfolk.com' will be up for renewal on 2
