p failed for
2001:ba8:1f1:f187::2 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Sun,
18 Sep 2011 16:48:21 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f187::2
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] spamd.lon.bitfolk.com renumbered;
old IP address will stop responding on Tuesday 18th October 2011
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:48:21 -0000
On 18/09/11 16:11, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> spamd.lon.bitfolk.com [212.13.194.5] has been renumbered to
> 85.119.80.248. If you're making use of our free spamd service then
> you may be referring to this host by IP address in your mail server
> (or similar) config.
I refer to it by name, but...
john@nimbus:~$ host spamd.lon.bitfolk.com
spamd.lon.bitfolk.com has address 212.13.194.5
john@nimbus:~$
I tried again from another host to make sure it wasn't in my cache and
got the same result.
John
From mike@??? Sun Sep 18 16:57:34 2011
Received: from exprod6og102.obsmtp.com ([64.18.1.183])
by bitfolk.com with smtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <mike@???>) id 1R5KgP-0007B1-5o
for users@???; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:57:34 +0000
Received: from mail-ww0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod6ob102.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP
ID DSNKTnYi+WoY0YeQoYnjPtcsMIvsOhWZXvNA@???;
Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:57:32 PDT
Received: by wwe32 with SMTP id 32so6809948wwe.29
for <users@???>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zanker.org; s=google;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Auc2CidgyerI/KajtuaGZdFr4SlUAVWslLi7kXunDl4=;
b=EpkV7NqAmaHqayhE1eAQGARnoz2JOpNFKe83yRVitTmCUB3M83a2jY1QOxwUxZAZ1a
cbWs8t7e8GQ3SIQgHlw96MrA9C0ijaEay0SQ4/usDxdki/7xpyyZjvyPVkLbETSXm4+m
IBEiNrYsObt4idhbir0BK+3wn4TUnNFBBdifc=
Received: by 10.227.145.13 with SMTP id b13mr1734675wbv.27.1316365047901;
Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.34]
(host109-149-73-28.range109-149.btcentralplus.com. [109.149.73.28])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fq9sm22027228wbb.15.2011.09.18.09.57.26
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E7622F5.705020
