Re: [bitfolk] The perils of opening tcp/22 to the Internet

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Hugo Mills
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] The perils of opening tcp/22 to the Internet
Hi Martin,

On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 09:28:35PM +0100, Martin Halford wrote:
> So /etc/fstab becomes:
>
> UUID=814d97eb-aee6-4af0-bc94-eb56188b65b5     /     ext3  


Why not leave it as LABEL=root?

Cheers,
Andy


From announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@??? Mon Aug 08 14:55:20 2011
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bitfolk.com)
    by bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from
    <announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???>)
    id 1QqREe-0000l8-Ka
    for users@???; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:55:20 +0000
Received: from andy by bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1QqREZ-0000l0-4C
    for announce@???; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:55:15 +0000
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:55:14 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: announce@???
Message-ID: <20110808145514.GH5935@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Mon,
    08 Aug 2011 14:55:15 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-BeenThere: announce@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1574260870=="
Sender: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
Errors-To: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Mon,
    08 Aug 2011 14:55:20 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: [bitfolk] Moved to calendar monthly / quarterly / yearly billing
X-BeenThere: users@???
Reply-To: users@???
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:55:20 -0000



--===============1574260870==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AJu7IxIPovG6hMTN"
Content-Disposition: inline



--AJu7IxIPovG6hMTN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

With immediate effect we are moving to a calendar monthly /
quarterly / yearly billing cycle instead of a rigid 30 / 90 / 360
day cycle.

This was requested in:
        https://tools.bitfolk.com/redmine/issues/13


You do not need to take any action. You will effectively get 5 or 6
days of additional service per year compared to before.

Cheers,
Andy

--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

--AJu7IxIPovG6hMTN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAk4/+NIACgkQIJm2TL8VSQsCXACgh9XKYU3HVYR3IQmffOCzONea
OnQAn295TxG6pYuDVnhV366nNSPMU4xF
=10Zv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AJu7IxIPovG6hMTN--


--===============1574260870==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
a