p (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <iain@???>) id 1QobfQ-0000Fj-HY
for users@???; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:39:32 +0000
Received: from pat.cs.nott.ac.uk ([128.243.20.9] helo=Cs.Nott.AC.UK)
by smtp1.nottingham.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <iain@???>) id 1QobfO-0006G7-In
for users@???; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:39:22 +0100
Received: from polihale.cs.nott.ac.uk by pat.Cs.Nott.AC.UK id aa20100;
3 Aug 2011 14:39 BST
Received: by orangesquash.org.uk (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:39:14 +0100
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:39:14 +0100
From: Iain Lane <iain@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20110803133914.GB2328@???>
Mail-Followup-To: users@???
References: <CALdaYd2gF1NZ5jaS08fgu_RzAWSOnL=ecw7KtJ8yTCSsfaDP_g@???>
<4E366A20.7020708@???>
<20110801094255.GY5935@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110801094255.GY5935@???>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Wed,
03 Aug 2011 13:39:24 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 128.243.44.4
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: iain@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
* medium trust
* [128.243.44.4 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
lines
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Digital Economy Act
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:39:32 -0000
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:42:55AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> [...]
> Note that it's entirely possible for there to be specific court
> ordered monitoring in place which a service provider is ordered to
> not discuss.
> [...]
Would a canary such as that employed by rsync.net work or fall foul of
some part of some act?
http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/canary.txt
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ iain@??? ]
Debian Developer [ laney@??? ]
Ubuntu Developer [ laney@??? ]
PhD student [ ial@??? ]
From andy@??? Wed Aug 03 14:33:36 2011
Received: from andy by bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1QocVr-0002dD-Vi
for users@???; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:33:36 +0000
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:33:35 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20110803143335.GP5935@???>
References: <CALdaYd2gF1NZ5jaS08fgu_RzAWSOnL=ecw7KtJ8yTCSsfaDP_g@???>
<4E366A20.7020708@???>
<20110801094255.GY5935@???>
<20110803133914.GB2328@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110803133914.GB2328@???
