from it. I c=
an ping the .1 address from the ten-dot range and the other interfaces on t=
he VPS.
>
> I've got no connectivity to the outside world. My VPS has 2 IP addresses =
on eth0 and eth0:1. I think I need to NAT the eth0:1 address so it can be u=
sed by the client as an Internet connection. I've tried the advice from a c=
ouple of online guides but I can't get it to work.
>
> I may have to travel as early as tomorrow so I'm running out of time for =
random experimentation. Can anyone give me some pointers on how to make thi=
s setup functional please?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
From andryan@??? Fri Feb 25 15:53:40 2011
Received: from mail-qw0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48])
by bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <andryan@???>) id 1PszzA-00070H-FD
for users@???; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:53:40 +0000
Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so1592687qwd.21
for <users@???>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:53:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=L/XlbJCVME9tkG5wyYVdDX/uZpBH/KhnK64FiJSgWas=;
b=P19mP62tpc3JkOt9L+w0gwzh3eTA3g7C0QliygBQVwtsXFQ8E1yK1/gE/qpKsyYidx
PdV1uQEqRiHSzC/ZI0AqnMRFuXXywUmTcWn5wPu/dM61R7g9mNe7yZ2ZBdtiYaHeSCzv
E6pA/DAmeyPqhxvEIqY7ujIdgdqLm2vcIgvpM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=UBZKhNM547oremT/kmkulws01dBnV867N+6GICEYQ4sU9xGvmdZODxsErpDxzvtdTR
5xFlTZP79UIzGUVARzgLz90w/RpWyqI4HvIcsgY3omQBVRaTeiLa+RCVBPn53c04V6I6
9US+3lzLrbyjxvcRoTTHiN9CDY2ij71MmYqW4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.83.198 with SMTP id g6mr1922689qcl.157.1298649213744; Fri,
25 Feb 2011 07:53:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.229.130 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:53:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <53162.1298635575@???>
References: <53162.1298635575@???>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:53:33 +0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikAoWiRmb49=Oc9KX7xLqys6OoafOL=av138pG4@???>
From: Andryan <andryan@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Fri,
25 Feb 2011 15:53:40 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.216.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andryan@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust * [209.85.216.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
S
