I'd recommend running your own with dovecot or use one of the folks
mentioned in the credits section of
http://dovecot.org/
From sundancecloud@??? Tue Mar 13 01:51:09 2012
Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <sundancecloud@???>)
id 1S7GtJ-0006c9-E1
for users@???; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:51:09 +0000
Received: by lbom11 with SMTP id m11so20983lbo.21
for <users@???>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=1148V0nqGnlX3zSj8z3iESJmfDvQ2K5GMEvYapBaKqs=;
b=rzwldSuTgINTUDaR0v+t3PxmTuGj6+6eWC7g4oEDw51kHPWJS9zPbL5mUjHJij5/YO
gQBgQlHzAggMKiVHSk3zqLHg8V4C8TUDAkyxMFe8jlk8L8RojPoUMYPgfePgAnBnhy4Z
LWeMZNbEV77eNJ3nAlOqZzN2J7P9TORV4pIc1jPb6HTxJQW4ReqeI/w7smZ3OsQc+T9l
eTxOnV7HMPHrQyegP7lHnzb2SAtBiOpJA3TrRx9Ix1Z+6QzR4Y43JW2VxhIm96oQd7r+
O0yVfViAg8EmerdkpX2mwq1RgytJP/nEkshNpTKw0O1Txd0NPfc6ZXPUt9q6QODe6oeI
MohQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.147.202 with SMTP id tm10mr11831920lab.49.1331603463239;
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.130.196 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF8XF0dQD3nRtiEX+9mYUbKWXEMiVoYHuey-Dzk5cHsG0sPCdg@???>
References: <CAL7LUj_b6aigz68cr2BwTLY61h7xQr_j9PrYw26Or69Wzq4a1A@???>
<CAF8XF0dQD3nRtiEX+9mYUbKWXEMiVoYHuey-Dzk5cHsG0sPCdg@???>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:51:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL7LUj85RhrX9mJoGTmouSWyYVQn6ZJmn05mN1HWg=gKYKX5Bw@???>
From: S P <sundancecloud@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2353116879c104bb16170b
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Tue,
13 Mar 2012 01:51:09 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.217.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sundancecloud@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust
* [209.85.217.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
