Re: [bitfolk] [Fwd: Apache 1.* and 2.* vulnerability]

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Jan Henkins
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] [Fwd: Apache 1.* and 2.* vulnerability]
FAk8/nYcACgkQIJm2TL8VSQuVrgCg82irJT3iWe9bn9Tpx/wazf5o
1fMAnA2vVY8hqgxWq6uu+dYaj0ptbTS5
=byvH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--f8uTbadvzI+nQOZu--


From dee@??? Sun Feb 19 16:15:30 2012
Received: from [2001:ba8:1f1:f0db:216:5eff:fe00:159] (helo=jane.earlsoft.co.uk)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <dee@???>) id 1Rz9QA-0007uP-En
    for users@???; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:15:30 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.67] (93-97-71-226.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.71.226])
    (authenticated bits=0)
    by jane.earlsoft.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1JFMdWg029872
    for <users@???>; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:22:39 GMT
Message-ID: <4F4113BC.2060801@???>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:22:36 +0000
From: Deanna Earley <dee@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2;
    rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <1329567256.98879.YahooMailClassic@???>
In-Reply-To: <1329567256.98879.YahooMailClassic@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3
    (jane.earlsoft.co.uk [85.119.83.77]);
    Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:22:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
    2001:ba8:1f1:f0db:216:5eff:fe00:159 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
    19 Feb 2012 16:15:30 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f0db:216:5eff:fe00:159
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dee@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
    shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
    * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] idle curiosity? bank phishing scam,
 was Fw: Notice ID:01ZMCX
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:15:30 -0000


>     1) Do I have a duty in law to maintain a phishbot-virus-free VPS?


Not really in law but the ability to run your own server securely should
be a prerequisite to trying to run a server.

>     3) Has a bitfolk VPS owner ever been targetted by phishbots? If so,
>     what were the symptoms and what were the ramifications?


I expect they target people and servers that are vulnerable. The fact it
could be running in a VPS or a 1024 core mainframe has absolutely no
bearing.

--
Deanna Earley (dee@???)

irc:    irc://irc.blitzed.org/
web:    http://www.earlsoft.co.uk
phone:  +44 (0)780 8369596



From paul@??? Mon Feb 20 12:18:50 2012
Received: from mailex.mailcore.me ([94.136.40.64])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <paul@???>) id 1RzSCg-0001MF-8m
    for users@???; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:18:50 +0000
Received: from redfox.vps.bitf