Re: [bitfolk] Ubuntu 10.04 on BitFolk (Was: Re: Support this…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Ubuntu 10.04 on BitFolk (Was: Re: Support thisweekend / Ubuntu Lucid LTS release)
ms to be running an outdated version.

1.9pre2 is available, it's probably on 1.8?

Al.


From danielcase10@??? Wed Oct 05 22:28:28 2011
Received: from mail-vw0-f48.google.com ([209.85.212.48])
    by bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <danielcase10@???>) id 1RBZwx-0004gC-NN
    for users@???; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:28:28 +0000
Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so2617510vws.21
    for <users@???>; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
    h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
    :cc:content-type;
    bh=Qby0EM+dJiEywoFYbHAn9KgoOodcY2RPv02hpLV5xJ8=;
    b=ucAAX/LjnMtUnqmBFR/yhb8gVOj0gMK1ej6dNdFwJQCM/WTGIE6yOsJLZg+RkmYIWf
    DlIDrctFqqf06LNVQ72SQTxd2bdBpmLh2ClkDeUG9hh4ju7lOAY1yYsYf4nw3lODORP8
    HoGNklEDLsCarx8aiAaJiKsPs5ZNpeVunWBDI=
Received: by 10.52.94.99 with SMTP id db3mr2933545vdb.448.1317853701109; Wed,
    05 Oct 2011 15:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.160.131 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJQXycfPoCWQ9rGMdn1m0TEZSPurfyAUaM1v7Nh9osm_dOTxhw@???>
References: <CALdaYd3nX9DJ-P2V=3e-QcHzsy0V=nhFsd6pCA4i2WichA+95Q@???>
    <CAJQXycfPoCWQ9rGMdn1m0TEZSPurfyAUaM1v7Nh9osm_dOTxhw@???>
From: Daniel Case <danielcase10@???>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 23:28:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CALdaYd1UtpnYpBOBV49xpsmQ8c0RiWOxVE0PqX6pYgcFieHbfA@???>
To: Alan Pope <alan@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Wed,
    05 Oct 2011 22:28:27 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.212.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielcase10@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.212.0/24
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
    SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
    low *      trust *      [209.85.212.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
    author's *       domain
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    *  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
    *      valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bitfolk.com)
Cc: BitFolk Users <users@???>
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Bitfolk Minecraft Server
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:28:28 -0000


It's because it's pre-release... wasn't sure whether to run that one
or not? I went for the stable 1.8.1 on the site, I don't t