Re: [bitfolk] Opinions on disabling time-based fsck

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Bennett
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Opinions on disabling time-based fsck
On 02/10/11 20:24, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello Dom,
>
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 06:39:40PM +0200, bitfolk-users@??? wrote:
>> On 02/10/11 12:36, Andy Smith wrote:
>>> entropy.lon.bitfolk.com [212.13.194.102] has been renumbered to
>>> 85.119.80.215. If you're making use of our free entropy service[1]
>>
>> Maybe I'm easily impressed, but I'm impressed.
>
> :-) impressed by the paranoia / nerdiness?


The comprehensiveness, as it were.

Apologies to the list for not giving my name in the previous
post - hopefully this one will have it.


From phl.jns@??? Mon Oct 03 13:50:28 2011
Received: from mail-pz0-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42])
    by bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <phl.jns@???>) id 1RAiuW-0008WP-08
    for users@???; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:50:28 +0000
Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so11800045pzk.1
    for <users@???>; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
    h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
    :content-type; bh=age6B4v5cjLejS4JUJzkxChphmAojJHnpaDncVrrX+g=;
    b=YQpnUSMaLhNawgDEf7ySc+uYDfTGGM2xU8g1AAh3zsN5TMf6q6D2ZlxUjaNUE659Ol
    IRFpy5v8Nupvv23CQGLJ76SmNignIPUtx3YIkcVsG4FC9AscD2iC7uWCWMCfNAYmwEkN
    LBDIb22l/hAoSuOqj/0Y0LcnWoXSiA26NcGlo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.32.132 with SMTP id j4mr1222054pbi.62.1317649815843; Mon,
    03 Oct 2011 06:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.128.14 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20111002103608.GR4221@???>
References: <20111002103608.GR4221@???>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:50:15 +0100
Message-ID: <CACLxmR_2+0VZzYHZ7j0Cm0TaTBki5cLrZetE6AVKbPoLEjrFcQ@???>
From: Phil Jones <phl.jns@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51dd7d736324904ae6541c4
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on bitfolk.com at Mon,
    03 Oct 2011 13:50:24 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.210.42
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: phl.jns@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
    low *      trust *      [209.85.210.42 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML incl