Re: [bitfolk] VPS renumbering failure

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: users
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] VPS renumbering failure

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Mon Feb 6 01:05:31 2012 UTC using DSA key ID BF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>"
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>"
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>"
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>"
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>"
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>"
Hello,

On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 02:33:36PM -0800, Max B wrote:
> BTW, shouldn't 85.119.82.67/32 be 85.119.82.67/21?
> netmask for your secondary address is inconsistent with the netmask for your primary eth0.


/32 netmasks work fine for additional IPs on the same network as
other IPs. It is a matter of great debate and personal taste though.

Cheers,
Andy