Re: [bitfolk] DNS in place of rsync

On Mon, July 26, 2010 9:51 pm, James Gregory wrote:

> I presume by this you mean that Bitfolk host your DNS, but that you
> hold the zone file for the DNS. In this case, you need a secondary DNS
> server that will host the zone information, but allow the Bitfolk DNS
> servers to replicate from.

Forgive the pedantry, but in case it helps clarify the situation: As
Michael will be managing/maintaining the zone file he will be the primary
DNS. Bitfolk will be acting as a secondary.

Mathew