[bitfolk] Add "Reply-To:" or not?

Αρχική Σελίδα
Συντάκτης: Andy Smith
Ημερομηνία:  
Προς: users
Αντικείμενο: [bitfolk] Add "Reply-To:" or not?

Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Mon Mar 15 13:52:47 2010 UTC using DSA key ID BF15490B
gpg: Good signature from "Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>"
gpg: aka "Andrew James Smith <andy@strugglers.net>"
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (UKUUG) <andy.smith@ukuug.org>"
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (BitFolk Ltd.) <andy@bitfolk.com>"
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Linux User Groups UK) <andy@lug.org.uk>"
gpg: aka "Andy Smith (Cernio Technology Cooperative) <andy.smith@cernio.com>"
Hello,

Some people don't like that this list has no Reply-To: header
directed back at the list.

Whilst I believe the way it's set up is technically correct and is
what I personally prefer, I'm willing to go with whatever makes the
most people happy.

Here's a poll: http://doodle.com/bmfbsa3paah2w97a

If you care about how the list is set up, please take a moment to
submit that web form.

I'd prefer if only people who have ever actually posted to this list
participated.

And please no discussion on this matter on-list - I think everything
that's ever been said on the subject is contained in the two links
listed on the poll, and no one's mind is going to be changed. If you
absolutely must make a comment, there's a comment thing on the poll.

Thanks!
Andy

-- 
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting


"I'd be happy to buy all variations of sex to ensure I got what I wanted."
-- Gary Coates (talking about cabling)