Although it is my opinion that 2 is probably the technically more
clever and useful option - you will probably find allowing an
alternative email (i.e. if there mail is hosted on bitfolk) to save
more agro.
On 27 January 2010 21:24, Robert Leverington <robert@???> wrote:
> On 2010-01-27, Andy Smith wrote:
>> Strictly speaking the above set of failures are going to be mostly
>> in customer hands so there is an argument that I need do nothing
>> more, however, two workarounds spring to mind.
>>
>> One is allowing people to configure multiple email addresses
>> (perhaps multiple roles, each with one or more addresses). Another
>> is to implement management of console SSH keys into the console and
>> web panel, so that people have an easier time getting in.
>>
>> Which would you prefer I tackled first?
>
> Personally I would prefer the latter as it has utility beyond simply
> rescuing inaccessible accounts.
>
> Robert
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLYK8ZAAoJEKps/C0U95hcvO8QAJzlbXYvq5pnhInW0IlIUZ/i
> X4T1/EKPm95IvM7Gpgdp2uQIWiOUJjovMtyHKxTrrI7BEaiidbzEME8EGceq6JXo
> trxcTl2b5/NCj/9qxZHFotfxjjsCZHnI/PZT+qVdBFdQuWe/+Ujq764eTsIhgbqH
> CA1GqKlnTZjpC/gXUt+8CPUHFWDUL3gwxqaAYrkJOLe5rW3bgRhdjOIk1LbDrf1C
> H3p1W3KbGZbF4YpbICv7XsqNwySJ5NW/BbogKlREFpqS1yRxe1sd7WqLmRbC7Gav
> NGOITckCcPeGbg/UqfuBvc4EcqGDdPKRxwe+zbV9742qMYuds23dnRF6xCzcFdp0
> f8XZh5fpj9iR0rpmgeIa0OrewrrMz/5Sq13jmioLO5gypZM+/OEYr7oHIRE/Emx3
> zFvjNZ/wXiWRuPH/pvN0ZqJJRpcv6qfHATuc1MaSH+fsuMtZxzGh3OVWGIA8P67i
> ckX0h1SvvTITaGin0sYNPYlU+ilr39iG2KyhPXEQmpE45be8c5ut0p2K0GJp3IB5
> 7jZkJVVhmQAKYTaUd5QDyh7GLFqkMKo5z+LIhiW1PIacuHl8vpJmcgVQljVGq4le
> LgiGTZ9HFCdFq1J/Z6PshnHhvCeOx7RwhzQZrjL7kZUPlcYVF5N0Tt3TUV+TwlBy
> cjtulDIyabDBn4CzEQdT
> =BKUk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
